Latest NewsBack to News
Governance: Lessons for healthcare boards from the finance sector
Posted 12 December 2018
In May 2018 the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority released the results of the inquiry into the Commonwealth Bank Australia. This report was described by then Treasurer, Scott Morrison, as required reading for every board member in the country. The report highlighted a range of governance failings in the CBA in relation to risk management, the manner in which boards hold management to account and the remuneration practices of the CBA, particularly with regard to CEOs and senior executives.
As 2018 continued many watched with interest, and sometimes incredulity, the Royal Commission into the finance sector play out on television screens and in the newspapers. It appears that many of the poor practices uncovered in the Prudential Inquiry are endemic in the finance industry.
The Royal Commission interim report was released by Commissioner Hayne in September 2018 and made for sobering reading. Whilst the NFP sector is vastly different to the corporate world, particularly the finance industry, many of the themes coming out of the review are related to good governance practice and we should all take note.
The Australian Institute of Company Directors recently released a summary on the key issues that directors should be aware of in relation to the early Commission findings. Some of these findings are very relevant to boards in the health sector and health directors would be wise to consider the governance themes in their own boards.
AICD suggests that directors should ask the following questions in relation to their own organisations:
- are existing remuneration structures appropriate particularly in regard to incentive based performance bonuses for senior executive and management staff
- does the organisation have effective governance and risk management processes in place to reduce the likelihood of misconduct?
- does the board have visibility of misconduct and poor outcomes for consumers?
Organisational culture has been highlighted as a key factor that allowed, and in some instances promoted, poor behaviour by the financial institutions. Commissioner Haynes has indicated that additional regulation and new laws will not necessarily rectify the issues of the past, as in many instances existing regulations and laws were contravened. A simple principle that should be followed by financial institutions equally applies to health service boards and governance in general.
Obey the law, do not mislead or deceive; be fair; provide services that are fit for purpose; deliver services with reasonable care and skill; and when acting for another, act in the best interests of that other.
The AICD advises that ‘Good culture and proper governance cannot be implemented by passing a law.’ Culture and governance are affected by rules, systems and practices but in the end they depend on people applying the right standards and doing their jobs properly.’
The finance sector is yet to provide its response to the early findings of the Commission and feedback from the industry will shape the final recommendations.
The ACHG will develop a governance brief for the health sector drawing on the lessons from the Prudential Inquiry, and upon its release, the final report from the Royal Commission. The ACHG will also reference the AICD Good Governance Principles and Guidance for Not-For-Profit Organisations, which is currently being revised and due for release in early 2019. It is expected that this brief will be made available to members in the first quarter of 2019.
To read the AICD Royal Commission Interim Report Summary for Directors click here.
News ArchiveView all
Emergency medicine pioneer to speak at VHA conference
Sydney-based emergency medicine specialist, Professor Gordian Fulde, who revolutionised emergency department operations in the 1980’s and founded the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine,… Read more
Registrations open: 2019 VHA Annual Conference
There is little dispute that the way our system is organised to deliver care must change. Funding is disjointed and systems are fragmented; primary care is treated separately from hospital care, and … Read more
Submission into Royal Commission into Victoria's Mental Health System
Mental Health Victoria has collaborated with the VHA to provide a joint submission into the Royal Commission into Victoria’s Mental Health System. The VHA consulted with its members, who … Read more
New integrity governance framework
The VHA and the Australian Centre for Healthcare Governance have released a new framework to support healthcare providers to establish governance frameworks and mitigate risk. Integrity … Read more
News Tags & Search
- Mental Health
- Service Reform
- Russell Kennedy
- State Trustees
- Rosemary Hardham Associates
- The Hdr Group
- Clear 2 Work
- First State Super
- Funding Reform
- Governance Evaluator
- Health Metrics
- State Budget Submission
- Federal Budget Submissions
- National Health Reform
- Media Release
- Rsm Australia
- Space For Health
- Klas Research
- Aged Care
- Information Management
- Population Health
- Safety Quality
- Acute Care
- Home Community Care
- Rural Remote Healthcare
- Alcohol Other Drugs
- Primary Community Health
- Strategic Plan
- Public Health
- State Election 2014
- Elective Surgery
- Ambulance Services
- Continuity Of Care
- Oral Health
- Pwc 1440